2026 Boulder Budget - Staffing

October 16, 2025

Since the pandemic staffing levels have risen significantly.


Staffing Levels 

Between 2019 and 2025 the city of Boulder increased staffing by 191 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) employees.  Graph 1 shows 1426 FTE in 2019 and 1539 FTE in 2023 for a net increase of 113 FTE.


In 2024 the Library was spun off reducing staff by 78 FTE. Those positions were distributed to other departments and by 2025 the workforce was once again at 1539.


Even though 2026 is an austerity budget, overall staffing rises to 1548 with the addition of city council members as full time employees. 

The total increase from 2019 to 2026 is 200 FTE.  This representing a 14% increase in headcount.

Graph 1 - Staffing Levels (FTE)

Department 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
City Attorney’s Office 25.7 25.7 27.7 27.7 28.0 28.0 27.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 27.0
City Clerk’s Office 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
City Council 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.0
City Manager’s Office 18.5 13.0 15.9 18.9 14.0 15.0 9.0 17.7 18.7 19.7 25.8 26.8
Climate Initiatives 21.0 18.0 19.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 22.0
Communication 8.5 12.8 13.5 14.8 15.3 16.3 17.8 20.5 29.3 29.4 33.0 33.5
Community Vitality 46.5 46.5 49.0 48.3 47.2 48.0 40.9 41.9 44.1 46.3 47.3 35.3
Facilities&Fleet 33.4 35.5 36.3 32.5 34.2 36.3 37.5 42.2 46.2 52.9 51.9 52.9
Finance 38.7 44.5 47.6 48.1 44.0 47.0 42.0 45.0 49.0 48.2 50.9 50.9
Fire-Rescue 121.3 124.3 124.0 124.0 123.0 124.0 122.0 133.0 138.0 142.0 142.0 140.0
Human Resources 24.6 24.4 23.4 23.4 23.0 23.0 22.0 24.0 32.0 27.0 28.0 28.0
Housing&Human Services 37.2 37.2 36.2 36.2 48.6 48.8 44.3 49.1 61.3 66.0 66.8 64.8
Information Technology 37.2 40.3 40.8 39.8 41.8 44.0 39.0 46.5 51.9 57.2 61.2 61.5
Library & Arts 78.5 78.5 77.5 77.5 77.8 80.3 68.8 77.8 77.8
Municipal Court 21.1 21.1 20.4 19.4 18.4 18.4 16.4 16.4 18.4 18.4 18.4 16.4
Open Space & Mountain Parks 102.4 117.2 128.4 125.4 121.6 125.4 126.4 127.4 136.5 145.6 147.6 142.6
Parks & Recreation 130.4 136.4 139.1 146.4 141.5 145.3 125.8 134.0 142.8 151.5 153.3 151.6
Planning, Housing & Sustainability 109.6 115.4 122.6 129.3 111.6 111.5 88.4 92.4 96.7 97.7 98.7 122.7
Police 288.0 290.9 291.9 291.8 288.3 289.3 280.6 288.9 285.5 282.0 284.5 280.5
Transportation 70.3 71.4 73.6 69.0 69.2 75.2 77.0 81.5 91.9 97.6 98.9 91.4
Utilities 166.9 168.0 168.9 172.7 173.8 173.9 168.2 178.6 176.0 180.9 181.1 190.6
Total 1361.8 1405.9 1440.5 1448.9 1426.1 1475.4 1375.8 1460.7 1539.6 1509.1 1539.1 1548.3

Table 1 - Staffing Levels (FTE) by Department 2015-2026


Staffing Changes 

From 2019 to 2025 some departments experienced significant changes.


  • Two departments effectively ceased to exist over this period:
  • The City Clerk’s Office was folded into the City Manager’s Office
  • Library & Arts was spun off into a Library district.
  • Planning, Housing & Sustainability shows a -12% change as a result of moving code enforcement to the Police department.
  • Communications grew 116% over that period.


The increase in staff size seen between 2019 and 2025 has the knock-on effect that support services also have to grow to service the additional FTEs. Table 2 shows the changes to staff size for each department. The 4 fastest growing departments are providing primarily internal support to themselves and public facing departments.


Resources required to support a growing workforce are not limited to additional FTEs but also includes employment benefits such as health insurance, pensions, real estate required to house the additional FTEs and Information Technology to provide digital support .

Department Change (%) Change (FTE) Service Type
Library & Arts -100% -77.8 Public
City Clerk’s Office -100% -4.0 Public
Planning, Housing & Sustainability -12% -12.9 Public
City Attorney’s Office -4% -1.0 Public
Police -1% -3.8 Public
Municipal Court 0% 0.0 Public
City Council 0% 0.0 Public
Community Vitality 0% 0.0 Public
Utilities 4% 7.3 Public
Parks & Recreation 8% 11.8 Public
Fire-Rescue 15% 19.0 Public
Finance 16% 6.9 Internal
Open Space & Mountain Parks 21% 26.0 Public
Human Resources 22% 5.0 Internal
Housing & Human Services 37% 18.2 Public
Transportation 43% 29.7 Public
Information Technology 47% 19.5 Internal
Facilities & Fleet 52% 17.7 Internal
City Manager’s Office 84% 11.8 Internal
Communication 116% 17.8 Internal

Table 2 - Staffing Changes from 2019 to 2025

2026 shows little growth among departments except for:

  • In 2024 Ballot item 2C passed, which increases City Council pay to 40% of AMI. This accounts for the +9 FTE in City Council numbers
  • The big change is moving 24 FTE to Planning, Housing & Sustainability (PHS)
  • Community Vitality transfers parking enforcement to PHS.
  • Police transfer code enforcement positions to PHS.



Department Change (%) Change (FTE) Service Type
Community Vitality -25% -12.0 Public
Municipal Court -11% -2.0 Public
Transportation -8% -7.4 Public
Open Space & Mountain Parks -3% -5.0 Public
Housing & Human Services -3% -2.0 Public
Fire-Rescue -1% -2.0 Public
Police -1% -4.0 Public
Parks & Recreation -1% -1.6 Public
Human Resources 0% 0.0 Internal
Finance 0% 0.0 Internal
Climate Initiatives 0% 0.0 Internal
City Attorney’s Office 0% 0.0 Public
Information Technology 0% 0.3 Internal
Communication 2% 0.5 Internal
Facilities & Fleet 2% 1.0 Internal
City Manager’s Office 4% 1.0 Internal
Utilities 5% 9.5 Public
Planning, Housing & Sustainability 24% 24.0 Public
City Council 900% 9.0 Public

Table 3 - Staffing Changes from 2025 to 2026


Staffing Costs

The costs of increasing staff size over the last 6 years as well as changes proposed for the 2026 budget can be seen in the Combined Budget Summary shown in Graph 2 and Table 4.  This summary aggregates the costs of personnel, internal services, operating expenses, debt service and capital projects.


What this data shows is:

  • From 2019 to 2025 the cost of personnel rose from $149M to $205M or 37%.
  • The cost of internal services increased from $17M in 2019 to $62M in 2025 or 264%.
  • For 2026 the amount devoted to capital projects will be sharply lower than the previous 3 years.
  • In the face of no staff reductions, the capital budget is absorbing all of the cuts, mainly for Facilities & Fleet.

Graph 2 - Combined Budget Summary

Combined Budget Summary 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Personnel $146M $148M $149M $149M $151M $167M $194M $204M $205M $219M
Operating $74M $84M $96M $133M $94M $128M $124M $139M $145M $148M
Internal Services $28M $18M $17M $22M $26M $42M $42M $49M $62M $66M
Debt Service $35M $28M $22M $13M $28M $31M $34M $32M $42M $40M
Capital $101M $112M $71M $43M $69M $66M $173M $147M $207M $121M
Total $385M $389M $354M $361M $367M $434M $567M $571M $661M $594M

Table 4 - Combined Budget Summary 2017-2026


Peer Cities 

When looking at the performance of an institution it is useful to compare them to their peers.


The comparative metric for Table 5 is FTEs per 100,000 residents of a city.


In this group Boulder is in the top 5 for most FTE per resident.


City FTE/100,000 FTE Population
Ann Arbor 728 849 116600
Durham 791 2404 304000
College Station 818 1047.5 128100
Madison 837 2375.85 283700
Iowa City 853 649.7 76200
Provo 859 963.8 112200
Mountain View 875 709.5 81100
Eugene 945 1683.5 178200
Gainesville 986 1461.75 148200
New Haven 1031 1433 139000
Fort Collins 1149 1960.65 170600
Tempe 1159 2235.4 192800
Chapel Hill 1197 783.74 65500
Evanston 1222 894.46 73200
Santa Barbara 1280 1088.15 85000
Huntsville 1407 3261 231700
Rochester 1442 2955 204900
Boulder 1474 1539.1 104400
Berkeley 1513 1747 115500
Cambridge 1552 1834 118200
Syracuse 1654 2395 144800
Pasadena 1847 2406.88 130300

Table 5 - Staffing Levels Among Peer Cities

Source:

  1. FTE Data: 2025 budget documents downloaded from the peer cities
  2. Population Data: https://worldpopulationreview.com/


October 19, 2025
Several projects in the works deserve a closer look.
October 17, 2025
2026 is a watershed moment for Boulder's budget.
October 16, 2025
Boulder sales tax revenue is flat and is anticipated to decline in coming years.
October 16, 2025
The 2026 Budget is set to levy a new fee on all property in Boulder.
By Allyn Feinberg September 23, 2025
Here are the PLAN-Boulder County positions on local ballot initiatives.
By Allyn Feinberg September 23, 2025
PLAN-Boulder County is limiting our endorsements of 2025 City Council candidates to three, even though there are four seats in the running. After the Collaborative Forum in which PLAN-Boulder, Open Boulder and Better Boulder jointly sponsored a candidate forum, the board also evaluated candidates’ responses to the PLAN-Boulder questionnaire and most significantly, assessed our experiences with the four incumbents over their past term. Based on these deliberations, we determined that our three endorsed candidates- Mark Wallach, Jenny Robins, and Rob Kaplan – are the ones that best support PLAN-Boulder’s values and policies.
By Allyn Feinberg September 12, 2025
Watch the video recording of the Sept. 8, 2025 Forum to get to know who is running for 4 open City Council seats .
By Allyn Feinberg September 11, 2025
Plan-Boulder County convenes a panel of water experts to discuss issues and make recommendations for the upcoming Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan revision.
By Peter Mayer June 5, 2024
Watch the video recording of the 2024 Democratic Legislative Candidate Primary Forum
By Peter Mayer September 11, 2023
John Mirisch, city council member and former mayor of Beverly Hills, CA gave an insightful talk at the 2023 PLAN-Boulder County annual dinner and meeting on September 8, 2023.